Back to case board
Analysis

The Vote: From 27% to 100%

How ranked-choice voting was weaponized through post-hoc disqualification to override the will of over 72% of voters.

Case 13 Case 19 Case 24 Case 27 Enforcement Bias Results

Round 1: What Voters Actually Chose

5,513 students cast ballots for Executive Vice President of External Affairs. The first-round results:

Kaleb Truchan37.95% · 2,092
Aydin Yelkovan34.32% · 1,892
Ricardo Miranda27.73% · 1,529

Miranda came in last place. In a normal ranked-choice election, the last-place candidate is eliminated first, and their votes are redistributed. Instead, the two candidates ahead of Miranda were both disqualified.

After Voting Closed

This is the critical detail: both disqualifications were announced after the voting period had already closed.

Timeline

Voting period: April 6, 10:00 AM — April 10, 4:00 PM

Case 27 hearing (disqualifying strike): April 10, during/after voting

Disqualification announced: After polls closed

Over 5,500 students voted without any knowledge that their preferred candidates would be removed. They had no opportunity to reconsider their ballots.

Round 2

After disqualification, here's how the votes were transferred according to the official tabulation:

Truchan's 2,092 ballots

846 transferred to Miranda (ranked 2nd)

1,049 transferred to Miranda (ranked 3rd)

197 exhausted (did not rank Miranda)

Yelkovan's 1,892 ballots

822 transferred to Miranda (ranked 2nd)

968 transferred to Miranda (ranked 3rd)

102 exhausted (did not rank Miranda)

The Final Tally

Kaleb TruchanDISQUALIFIED
Aydin YelkovanDISQUALIFIED
Ricardo Miranda100% · 5,214

Miranda went from 1,529 votes (27.73%) to 5,214 votes (100%). He received not only the votes of people who ranked him second, but also those who ranked him third — and the tabulation treated all transfers identically.

Illegitimate Winner

Standard ranked-choice voting works by eliminating candidates one at a time, starting with the last-place finisher. Voters' ballots then transfer to their next-ranked choice. This process repeats until one candidate achieves 50% + 1.

The Elections Code requires a candidate to achieve 50% + 1 to win. The Assoiciation used the frameowork of Robert's Rules of Order, and the Judicial Board itself upheld it as the governing parliamentary standard for ASUCSD elections in a 2014 grievance case. But the rules state thatvotes cast for disqualified candidates are voided but still count toward the total when calculating whether a majority has been reached.

Miranda did not recieve enough votes to win, as required by the Elections Code and Robert's Rules of Order.
Prev: Structural Bias Back to Overview